Terug naar Encyclopedie

Evidence in Prohibited Dismissal in Leiden: How Do You Prove Discrimination?

Prove discrimination in Leiden with documents, witnesses, and reversal of the burden of proof. Indirect evidence suffices according to the Supreme Court, ideal for university and LUMC cases.

2 min leestijd

Evidence in Prohibited Dismissal in Leiden: How Do You Prove Discrimination?

In Leiden, with its thriving university and high-tech companies, dismissals are part of everyday reality. In cases of suspected prohibited dismissal, evidence is crucial. This article explains how to demonstrate discrimination, with tips specifically for Leiden employers and employees.

Reversal of the Burden of Proof in Leiden Cases

Since the Work and Security Act (WWZ), reversal of the burden of proof applies (Article 7:670 paragraph 3 of the Dutch Civil Code). For 'sensitive' grounds for dismissal, such as discrimination based on origin or gender – common in Leiden's academic and healthcare sectors – the employer must prove that it is not discriminatory. The District Court of The Hague, which handles Leiden cases, applies this strictly.

Practical Means of Proof for Leiden Residents

  • Documents: Exit interviews from Leiden University, emails from Bio Science Parks, or personnel files at local hospitals such as LUMC.
  • Witnesses: Colleagues from Leiden startups or university faculties who recognize discrimination patterns.
  • Statistics: Disproportionate dismissals among international researchers or female PhD candidates in Leiden.
  • Medical file: Essential in illness-related claims, often relevant in the Leiden medical world.

The Supreme Court recently ruled that indirect evidence is sufficient for successful claims. Build a strong file with local examples, such as cases at the subdistrict court in Leiden, and engage a specialized employment lawyer for your proceedings at the District Court of The Hague. This maximizes your chances of a fair outcome. (248 words)