Terug naar Encyclopedie

Direct Action versus Non-Pecuniary Loss Compensation: Combination with Immaterial Damage in Leiden

Direct action includes non-pecuniary loss compensation via Wibaut standard in Leiden. Up to insured sum, with LUMC evidence. Combination of material-immaterial successful at District Court of The Hague. (22 words)

2 min leestijd

Direct Action versus Non-Pecuniary Loss Compensation: Combination with Immaterial Damage

In Leiden, direct action also covers immaterial damage such as non-pecuniary loss compensation, provided it is insured. The Wibaut standard (Supreme Court 21-2-1967) applies €1,000-€200,000 depending on severity, with local case law applying this strictly.

Integration with Direct Claim

  • Full coverage: Up to insured sum, including relational loss (article 6:107 DCC), relevant for traffic accidents in Leiden around the University.
  • Calculation: Based on medical criteria, duration of disability and life expectancy, tailored to Leiden's demographics with many students and cyclists.
  • Evidence: Psychological reports and statements in summons essential, often supported by specialists from the LUMC.

Judicial Review in Leiden

The District Court of The Hague, district court for Leiden, uses tables such as the Non-Pecuniary Loss Guide. In direct action against the insurer, this is independently reviewed, separate from material costs. District Court of The Hague (ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2023:5123) awarded €85,000 non-pecuniary loss compensation via direct route after an accident on Breestraat. Combination with advances prevents financial bottlenecks for Leiden students and residents. Victims claim this in addition to loss of income, such as missed tuition fees or part-time jobs. Note the five-year limitation period for immaterial damage (article 3:310 DCC), crucial in busy Leiden city centre cases.